Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400.
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Halo Infinite than Core i5-11400 - 179 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-11400
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - £142.12 vs £427.67
- Up to 64% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Core i9-13900KF - £0.86 vs £2.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
179
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.39/FPS
36%
Price, £
£427.67
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for £427.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5657 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
166
93%
Value, £/FPS
£0.86/FPS
100%
Price, £
£142.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £142.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5657 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900KF | vs | Core i5-11400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |