The Core i9-13900K is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Pentium G4560. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i9-13900K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Pentium G4560
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 54 vs 125 Watts
Core i9-13900K vs Pentium G4560 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
221
100%
Min 1% FPS
145
100%
Price, £
£503.99
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.28/FPS
100%
Pentium G4560
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
172
78%
Min 1% FPS
115
79%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-13900K vs Pentium G4560 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900K vs Pentium G4560 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900K vs Pentium G4560 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Pentium G4560
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-13900K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Pentium G4560 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
$589.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
125 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
36 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |