Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 18% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-10100 - 222 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-10100
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - £100.20 vs £416.35
- Up to 72% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-13900K - £0.53 vs £1.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
222
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.88/FPS
28%
Price, £
£416.35
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for £416.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
188
85%
Value, £/FPS
£0.53/FPS
100%
Price, £
£100.2
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £100.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900K | vs | Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |