Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Core i5-14400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 369 days older than Core i5-14400F.
Advantages of Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 7% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-14400F - 730 vs 680 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
730
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.78/FPS
100%
Price, £
£568.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £568.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900 | vs | Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |