Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 233 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-11900F.
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-11900F - 154 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i9-11900F
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - £238.66 vs £258.17
- Up to 2% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-12900KF - £1.65 vs £1.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
154
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.68/FPS
98%
Price, £
£258.17
92%
FPS Winner
Buy for £258.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
145
94%
Value, £/FPS
£1.65/FPS
100%
Price, £
£238.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £238.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-12900KF | vs | Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |