Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 294 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600.
Advantages of Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-11600 - 210 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-11600
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - £260.01 vs £422.01
- Up to 36% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-12900 - £1.28 vs £2.01 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for £422.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 340 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
203
97%
Value, £/FPS
£1.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£260.01
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £260.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 340 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-12900 | vs | Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |