Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 614 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600KF.
Advantages of Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 31% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-10600KF - 170 vs 130 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-10600KF
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - £115.66 vs £422.01
- Up to 64% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i9-12900 - £0.89 vs £2.48 per FPS
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £422.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
130
76%
Value, £/FPS
£0.89/FPS
100%
Price, £
£115.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £115.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-12900 | vs | Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |