Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-11900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-11900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF and the cheaper Core i9-11900F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 4% better in War Thunder than Core i9-11900F - 239 vs 229 FPS
Advantages of Core i9-11900F
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - £395.64 vs £460.34
- Up to 10% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-11900KF - £1.73 vs £1.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
239
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.93/FPS
90%
Price, £
£460.34
85%
FPS Winner
Buy for £460.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
229
96%
Value, £/FPS
£1.73/FPS
100%
Price, £
£395.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £395.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900KF | vs | Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |