Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF and the cheaper Core i5-11600K have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-11600K - 207 vs 204 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-11600K
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - £200.32 vs £460.34
- Up to 56% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-11900KF - £0.98 vs £2.22 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
207
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.22/FPS
44%
Price, £
£460.34
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for £460.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6037 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
204
99%
Value, £/FPS
£0.98/FPS
100%
Price, £
£200.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £200.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6037 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900KF | vs | Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |