Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 618 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 11% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 5 3600 - 198 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - £101.40 vs £399.99
- Up to 72% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-11900K - £0.57 vs £2.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
198
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.02/FPS
28%
Price, £
£399.99
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for £399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1093 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
179
90%
Value, £/FPS
£0.57/FPS
100%
Price, £
£101.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £101.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1093 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900K | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |