Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-11900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900 is 294 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-11900.
Advantages of Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield IV than Core i9-11900 - 467 vs 450 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - £415.53 vs £427.45
- Up to 6% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-11900 - £0.89 vs £0.95 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900 - 24 vs 16 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £427.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 293 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
467
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.89/FPS
100%
Price, £
£415.53
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £415.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 293 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900 | vs | Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |