The Core i9-10920X is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Ryzen 7 2700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i9-10920X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 2700
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 65 vs 165 Watts
Core i9-10920X vs Ryzen 7 2700 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-10920X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, £
£748.7
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.89/FPS
100%
Ryzen 7 2700
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
180
94%
Min 1% FPS
120
94%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i9-10920X vs Ryzen 7 2700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10920X vs Ryzen 7 2700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10920X vs Ryzen 7 2700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10920X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 2700
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
16 MB
83%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-10920X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 7 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $299.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Cascade Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 GHz |
19.25 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
