In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-10900X is slightly slower than the Ryzen 7 5700 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $293 more expensive!
Core i9-10900X
No clear advantages
Ryzen 7 5700
- Up to 12% faster in Battlefield 6 – 95 vs 85 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer – Apr 04, 2022 vs Oct 19, 2019
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer
- Up to 65% cheaper – $156.85 vs $449.98
- Up to 65% cheaper
- Up to 69% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.65 vs $5.29/FPS
- Up to 69% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 65 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 61% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900X vs Ryzen 7 5700: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
85 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
90%
Price, $
$449.98
34%
Value, $/FPS
$5.29/FPS
31%
Ryzen 7 5700
Apr 4th, 2022
Average FPS
95 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
71 FPS
100%
Price, $
$156.85
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.65/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900X vs Ryzen 7 5700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900X vs Ryzen 7 5700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 5700
Apr 4th, 2022
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
16 MB
83%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
98%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900X Oct 19th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 5700 Apr 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2019 | Released | Apr 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $179.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | AM4 |
| 165 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
