The Core i9-10900F is a slightly faster gaming CPU than the Ryzen 3 3100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i9-10900F
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3100
The Core i9-10900F is better in every way
Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 3 3100 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 3 3100
Apr 24th, 2020
Average FPS
188
98%
Min 1% FPS
124
98%
Price, £
£136.72
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.72/FPS
100%
Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 3 3100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 3 3100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900F vs Ryzen 3 3100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
92%
Ryzen 3 3100
Apr 24th, 2020
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
16 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
75%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-10900F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 3 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
| $464.00 | MSRP | $99.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
20 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
