Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 987 days newer than Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Core i9-10900F
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 13% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i9-10900F - 565 vs 500 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
565
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.87/FPS
100%
Price, £
£491.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £491.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 449 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900F | vs | Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |