Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900K is 880 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900.
Advantages of Core i9-10900
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 10% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i9-10900 - 137 vs 125 FPS
- Up to 0% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - £416.35 vs £417.86
- Up to 9% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i9-10900 - £3.04 vs £3.34 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900 - 32 vs 20 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £417.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8665 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
137
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.04/FPS
100%
Price, £
£416.35
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £416.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8665 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900 | vs | Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |