The Core i9-10850K is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Ryzen 3 3200G. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i9-10850K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
Core i9-10850K vs Ryzen 3 3200G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-10850K
Jul 27th, 2020
Average FPS
193
100%
Min 1% FPS
128
100%
Price, £
£507.84
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.63/FPS
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
179
93%
Min 1% FPS
119
93%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-10850K vs Ryzen 3 3200G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10850K vs Ryzen 3 3200G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10850K vs Ryzen 3 3200G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10850K
Jul 27th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-10850K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
20 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |