In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-9700F is slightly slower than the Ryzen 9 6900HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-9700F
No clear advantages
Ryzen 9 6900HX
- Up to 18% faster in Battlefield 6 – 98 vs 83 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer – Jan 14, 2022 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700F vs Ryzen 9 6900HX: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
83 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
62 FPS
85%
Price, $
$235.31
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.83/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700F vs Ryzen 9 6900HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700F vs Ryzen 9 6900HX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Ryzen 9 6900HX
Jan 14th, 2022
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 6900HX Jan 14th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Jan 14th, 2022 |
| $333.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | FP7 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon 680M |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
