In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-9700F is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $81 cheaper!
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 25% cheaper – $249.00 vs $329.95
- Up to 25% cheaper
- Up to 22% better value in Battlefield 6 – $3.03 vs $3.88/FPS
- Up to 22% better value in Battlefield 6
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 4% faster in Battlefield 6 – 85 vs 82 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 7 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 1 year and 7 days newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700F vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
82 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
61 FPS
97%
Price, $
$249
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.03/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
85 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
63 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
75%
Value, $/FPS
$3.88/FPS
78%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700F vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700F vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
98%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $333.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
