Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 3188 days newer than Core i7-965.
Advantages of Core i7-965
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 3% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Core i7-965 - 307 vs 297 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-965 - 32 vs 8 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Core i7-965
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-965 | vs | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
