The Core i7-965 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-9700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-965
The Core i7-9700F is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i7-9700F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
Core i7-965 vs Core i7-9700F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-965
Nov 17th, 2008
Average FPS
168
88%
Min 1% FPS
113
90%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
190
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, £
£294.66
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.55/FPS
100%
Core i7-965 vs Core i7-9700F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-965 vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-965 vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-965
Nov 17th, 2008
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.46 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-965 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-9700F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $333.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
