The Core i7-960 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-10700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-960
The Core i7-10700F is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i7-10700F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 8 threads
Core i7-960 vs Core i7-10700F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Average FPS
168
88%
Min 1% FPS
113
90%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
191
100%
Min 1% FPS
126
100%
Price, £
£226.66
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.18/FPS
100%
Core i7-960 vs Core i7-10700F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-960 vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-960 vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-960
Oct 20th, 2009
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.46 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-960 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 20th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
