The Core i7-950 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Xeon E5-1620 v4. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-950
- Consumes up to 7% less energy – 130 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of the Xeon E5-1620 v4
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
Core i7-950 vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Average FPS
167
93%
Min 1% FPS
112
93%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Average FPS
180
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.27/FPS
100%
Core i7-950 vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-950 vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-950 vs Xeon E5-1620 v4 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
80%
Base Frequency
3.07 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
3.33 GHz
88%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-950 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $294.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
130 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 10 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
