The Core i7-950 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-11400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-950
The Core i5-11400F is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i5-11400F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 8 threads
Core i7-950 vs Core i5-11400F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Average FPS
167
84%
Min 1% FPS
112
85%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-11400F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
198
100%
Min 1% FPS
131
100%
Price, £
£114.98
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.58/FPS
100%
Core i7-950 vs Core i5-11400F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-950 vs Core i5-11400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-950 vs Core i5-11400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-950
Jun 2nd, 2009
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.07 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.33 GHz
76%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-11400F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-950 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Not Available | MSRP | $157.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
130 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | No |