Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 3791 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Core i7-940XM
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 13% better in Deathloop than Core i7-940XM - 189 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 24 vs 8 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
189
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.08/FPS
100%
Price, £
£204
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £204 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 236 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-940XM | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |