Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Core i7-920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 3574 days newer than Core i7-920XM.
Advantages of Core i7-920XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 44% better in Starfield than Core i7-920XM - 62 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920XM - 16 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-920XM
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Ryzen 7 3700X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-920XM | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
