Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms Core i7-920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 5137 days newer than Core i7-920XM.
Advantages of Core i7-920XM
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-920XM - 200 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920XM - 32 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-920XM
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Core i9-14900KF
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-920XM | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i9 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
