In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-820QM is quite a bit slower than the Core i3-14100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 45 vs 58 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 69% faster in Battlefield 6 – 105 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 69% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 14 years and 3 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 23, 2009
- Is 14 years and 3 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-820QM vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
105 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
78 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-820QM vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-820QM vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-820QM
Sep 23rd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
1.733 GHz
50%
Turbo Frequency
3.067 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
28%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-820QM Sep 23rd, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 23rd, 2009 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $546.00 | MSRP | $109.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1700 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
None | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
