Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Core i7-7820HK on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 1402 days newer than Core i7-7820HK.
Advantages of Core i7-7820HK
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 12% better in No Man's Sky than Core i7-7820HK - 193 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7820HK - 32 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.45/FPS
100%
Price, £
£279.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £279.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7485 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-7820HK | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |