In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-7700T is slower than the Core i9-10900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-7700T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i9-10900K
- Up to 29% faster in Battlefield 6 – 90 vs 70 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-7700T vs Core i9-10900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-7700T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
70 FPS
78%
Min 1% FPS
52 FPS
76%
Price, $
$326.08
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.65/FPS
100%
![Intel Core i7 i7-7700T Quad-core [4 Core] 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B07D9KVGTL.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-7700T vs Core i9-10900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-7700T vs Core i9-10900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-7700T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
72%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
82%
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-7700T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $547.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
