The Core i7-7700 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Pentium G6950. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-7700
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Pentium G6950
The Core i7-7700 is better in every way
Core i7-7700 vs Pentium G6950 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-7700
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, £
£162.66
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.87/FPS
100%
Pentium G6950
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
164
88%
Min 1% FPS
111
90%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-7700 vs Pentium G6950 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-7700 vs Pentium G6950 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-7700 vs Pentium G6950 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-7700
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Pentium G6950
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
44%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-7700 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Pentium G6950 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $87.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
65 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
| Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1066 MHz |
| HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
