In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-6900K is slower than the Core i9-10900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-6900K
No clear advantages
Core i9-10900K
- Up to 18% faster in Battlefield 6 – 90 vs 76 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 10 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs May 31, 2016
- Is 3 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 125 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 11% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-6900K vs Core i9-10900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-6900K
May 31st, 2016
Average FPS
76 FPS
84%
Min 1% FPS
57 FPS
84%
Price, $
$289.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.81/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6900K vs Core i9-10900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6900K vs Core i9-10900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6900K
May 31st, 2016
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
70%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
82%
Core i9-10900K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-6900K May 31st, 2016 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 31st, 2016 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $1,089.00 | MSRP | $547.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
