The Core i7-6900K is a slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-10700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-6900K
The Core i7-10700F is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i7-10700F
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
Core i7-6900K vs Core i7-10700F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-6900K
May 31st, 2016
Average FPS
183
96%
Min 1% FPS
122
97%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
191
100%
Min 1% FPS
126
100%
Price, £
£226.66
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.18/FPS
100%
Core i7-6900K vs Core i7-10700F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6900K vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6900K vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6900K
May 31st, 2016
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
82%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
80%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-6900K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $1,089.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Broadwell-E | Codename | Comet Lake |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 GHz |
20 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
