Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2409 days newer than Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 53% better in Starfield than Core i7-6800K - 84 vs 55 FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 120 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6800K - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
84
100%
Value, £/FPS
£14.05/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1179.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £1,179.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6800K | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |