The Core i7-6800K is a slightly faster gaming CPU than the Ryzen 7 2700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-6800K
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 2700
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 12 threads
Core i7-6800K vs Ryzen 7 2700 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-6800K
May 31st, 2016
Average FPS
182
100%
Min 1% FPS
121
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 7 2700
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
180
99%
Min 1% FPS
120
99%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-6800K vs Ryzen 7 2700 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-6800K vs Ryzen 7 2700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-6800K vs Ryzen 7 2700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-6800K
May 31st, 2016
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
15 MB
94%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
88%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
82%
Ryzen 7 2700
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-6800K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 7 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| $434.00 | MSRP | $299.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Broadwell-E | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 GHz |
| 15 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
