Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6700K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 1436 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6700K.
Advantages of Core i7-6700K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 3% better in Borderlands 3 than Core i7-6700K - 226 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - £102.17 vs £158.66
- Up to 37% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Core i7-6700K - £0.45 vs £0.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700K - 12 vs 8 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Buy for £158.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 300 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
226
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.45/FPS
100%
Price, £
£102.17
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £102.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 300 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6700K | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |