Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 2085 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Core i7-6700
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - £119.99 vs £368.66
- Up to 63% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i9-11900KF - £1.38 vs £3.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Remnant II than Core i7-6700 - 98 vs 87 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 16 vs 8 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
87
89%
Value, £/FPS
£1.38/FPS
100%
Price, £
£119.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £119.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 240 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
98
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.76/FPS
37%
Price, £
£368.66
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for £368.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 239 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6700 | vs | Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |