In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-640M is slower than the Ryzen 5 2600X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-640M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 35 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 21% faster in Battlefield 6 – 74 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer – Apr 19, 2018 vs Sep 26, 2010
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-640M vs Ryzen 5 2600X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 2600X
Apr 19th, 2018
Average FPS
74 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
55 FPS
100%
Price, $
$72.54
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-640M vs Ryzen 5 2600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-640M vs Ryzen 5 2600X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-640M
Sep 26th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
3.467 GHz
82%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
36%
Ryzen 5 2600X
Apr 19th, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.25 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-640M Sep 26th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 2600X Apr 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 26th, 2010 | Released | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| $346.00 | MSRP | $229.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | AM4 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1066 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
