The Core i7-620M is a faster gaming CPU than the Core i3-530. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-620M
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 35 vs 73 Watts
Advantages of the Core i3-530
The Core i7-620M is better in every way
Core i7-620M vs Core i3-530
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
196
100%
Min 1% FPS
93
100%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-530
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
195
99%
Min 1% FPS
92
99%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-620M vs Core i3-530 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-620M vs Core i3-530 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-620M vs Core i3-530 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
80%
Core i3-530
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.933 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-620M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-530 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $332.00 | MSRP | $113.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Clarkdale |
35 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1066 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1333 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
