The Core i7-4860HQ is a slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-8100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-4860HQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 47 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i3-8100
- A faster CPU for gaming
Core i7-4860HQ vs Core i3-8100 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-4860HQ
Feb 1st, 2014
Average FPS
179
98%
Min 1% FPS
119
98%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
183
100%
Min 1% FPS
122
100%
Price, £
£127.48
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.69/FPS
100%
Core i7-4860HQ vs Core i3-8100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4860HQ vs Core i3-8100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4860HQ vs Core i3-8100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4860HQ
Feb 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
67%
Core i3-8100
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-4860HQ | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-8100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $117.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Crystal Well | Codename | Coffee Lake |
47 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
| 6 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| Intel HD 5200 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
