The Core i7-4860HQ is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-10105. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-4860HQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 47 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i3-10105
- A much faster CPU for gaming
Core i7-4860HQ vs Core i3-10105 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-4860HQ
Feb 1st, 2014
Average FPS
179
96%
Min 1% FPS
119
96%
Price, £
Out of Stock
Value, £/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
187
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, £
£102.42
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.54/FPS
100%
Core i7-4860HQ vs Core i3-10105 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4860HQ vs Core i3-10105 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4860HQ vs Core i3-10105 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4860HQ
Feb 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
82%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-4860HQ | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-10105 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $122.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Crystal Well | Codename | Comet Lake |
47 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 GHz |
| 6 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| Intel HD 5200 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
