In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-4820K is quite a bit slower than the Core i3-12100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4820K
No clear advantages
Core i3-12100F
- Up to 56% faster in Battlefield 6 – 97 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 56% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer – Jan 13, 2022 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 58 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-4820K vs Core i3-12100F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
62 FPS
64%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
64%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.22/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4820K vs Core i3-12100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4820K vs Core i3-12100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
83%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
91%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-12100F
Jan 13th, 2022
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4820K Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-12100F Jan 13th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 13th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $97.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
