In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-3820 is much slower than the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3820
No clear advantages
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Up to 156% faster in Battlefield 6 – 159 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 156% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 10 years and 10 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Feb 13, 2012
- Is 10 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 8% less energy – 120 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 8% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-3820 vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-3820
Feb 13th, 2012
Average FPS
62 FPS
39%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
39%
Price, $
$151
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3820 vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3820 vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3820
Feb 13th, 2012
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
10 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
31%
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3820 Feb 13th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7950X3D Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 13th, 2012 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$305.00 | MSRP | $699.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | AM5 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
