Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 4271 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Core i7-3770S
- Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - £102.64 vs £239.56
- Up to 39% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - £2.18 vs £3.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 43% better in Starfield than Core i7-3770S - 67 vs 47 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 16 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
47
70%
Value, £/FPS
£2.18/FPS
100%
Price, £
£102.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £102.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
67
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.58/FPS
61%
Price, £
£239.56
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for £239.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770S | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |