Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 3112 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Core i7-3770K
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 77 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 39% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-3770K - 258 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - £204.00 vs £399.98
- Up to 63% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-3770K - £0.79 vs £2.16 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 24 vs 8 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for £399.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
258
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.79/FPS
100%
Price, £
£204
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £204 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770K | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |