Buy on Amazon
£552.48
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP $449
Availability
MSRP $449
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Core i7-3635QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3777 days newer than Core i7-3635QM.
Advantages of Core i7-3635QM
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 45 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 55% better in New World than Core i7-3635QM - 153 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3635QM - 16 vs 8 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
153
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.61/FPS
100%
Price, £
£552.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D CPU AM5 4.2GHz (5.0 Turbo) 8-Core 120W 104MB Cache 5nm 7th Gen Radeon Graphics NO HEATSINK/FAN - 100-100000910WOF
Buy for £552.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 234 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-3635QM
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3635QM | vs | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
PCs Using Core i7-3635QM or Ryzen 7 7800X3D
With selected game settings
116 FPS
£16.81/FPS
32 GB, 2 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
£1,949.94
In Stock
125 FPS
£13.6/FPS
64 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
£1,699.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
