In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-3630QM is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-11700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-3630QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-11700F
- Up to 61% faster in Battlefield 6 – 98 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 61% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Sep 30, 2012
- Is 8 years and 5 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-3630QM vs Core i7-11700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-3630QM
Sep 30th, 2012
Average FPS
61 FPS
62%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
63%
Price, $
$229
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.75/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3630QM vs Core i7-11700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3630QM vs Core i7-11700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3630QM
Sep 30th, 2012
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
69%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
50%
Core i7-11700F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3630QM Sep 30th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-11700F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 30th, 2012 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| $378.00 | MSRP | $298.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1200 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
