In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-3520M is much slower than the Core i7-14700K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $352 cheaper!
Core i7-3520M
- Up to 87% cheaper – $53.99 vs $405.72
- Up to 87% cheaper
- Up to 71% better value in Battlefield 6 – $0.88 vs $3.07/FPS
- Up to 71% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i7-14700K
- Up to 116% faster in Battlefield 6 – 132 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 116% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jun 03, 2012
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-3520M vs Core i7-14700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-3520M
Jun 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
61 FPS
46%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
46%
Price, $
$53.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Core i7-14700K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
132 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
99 FPS
100%
Price, $
$405.72
13%
Value, $/FPS
$3.07/FPS
29%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3520M vs Core i7-14700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3520M vs Core i7-14700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3520M
Jun 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
10%
L3 Cache
4 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
64%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-14700K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3520M Jun 3rd, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 3rd, 2012 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $409.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
