Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4500 outperforms Core i7-2920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4500 is 4109 days newer than Core i7-2920XM.
Advantages of Core i7-2920XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 4500 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 4500 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 4500
- Performs up to 37% better in Dirt 5 than Core i7-2920XM - 188 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2920XM - 12 vs 8 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-2920XM
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Ryzen 5 4500
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2920XM | vs | Ryzen 5 4500 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
