In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-2820QM is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-7980XE. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-2820QM
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 45 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-7980XE
- Up to 39% faster in Battlefield 6 – 85 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 39% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer – Sep 01, 2017 vs Jan 03, 2011
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-2820QM vs Core i9-7980XE: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2820QM vs Core i9-7980XE in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2820QM vs Core i9-7980XE in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2820QM
Jan 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
22%
L3 Cache
8 MB
32%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
77%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-7980XE
Sep 1st, 2017
Cores
18-core
100%
L3 Cache
24.75 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-2820QM Jan 3rd, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-7980XE Sep 1st, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2011 | Released | Sep 1st, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $1,999.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA2066 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
